Why Are Quranic Verses Divided into Muhkam and Mutashabih?
Question
Answer
- Allah (Most High) challenged the Arabs with the Quran, as it was their pride and leadership in eloquence, rhetoric, conciseness, elaboration, metaphors, and all the other linguistic arts, and thus the Quran also encompassed these arts.
- Allah (Most High) revealed the Mutashabih as a test for the believer, so that they may reflect upon it and return to their knowledgeable ones, thereby increasing their rewards, while causing the hypocrite to doubt, thus deserving punishment (a test for the wise).
- Allah (Most High) revealed the Mutashabih to occupy the hearts of the believers, engage their faculties, consume their efforts, and cause their time and lifespans to be spent in seeking it so they would attain the rewards according to the hardships endured. Their influence on others would be such that they would work for their Lord as they did through prayers, fasting, a pilgrimage from their homes to a land they were not accustomed to except with great effort, and other acts of worship. Thus, the Mutashabih became a field where ideas and sciences were refined. [Zurqani, Manahil al-‘Irfan; ‘Itr, ‘Ulum al-Quran]
Detailed Answer
Meaning
- Muhkam verses whose meanings are reasonable, such as the obligation of prayers and fasting in Ramadan.
- Muhkam verses are acted upon, unlike Mutashabih, which are believed but not acted upon.
- Muhkam verses with connected letters, while Al-Mutashabih has disjointed letters, as seen at the beginning of some chapters.
- Muhkam is the abrogator, while Mutashabih is abrogated. [Barmawi, Fawa’id al-Sanniyya fi Sharh al-Alfiyya; Zurqani, Manahil al-‘Irfan]
The First Opinion: Interpretable
The Second Opinion: Divine Exclusivity
The Third Opinion: Middle-Ground Perspective
- A type for which there is no way to comprehend its meaning, like the timing of the Hour and the emergence of the beast, and similar matters;
- A type for which humans have some means to understand, like unfamiliar words and closed-off rulings;
- A type that is ambiguous to some but clear to others firmly grounded in knowledge. This is indicated by the saying of the Prophet Muhammad (Allah bless him and give him peace) to Ibn ‘Abbas: “O Allah, grant him understanding of the religion and teach him interpretation.” [Suyuti, al-Itqan fi ‘Ulum al-Quran; Zurqani, Manahil al-‘Irfan; Subhi, Mabahis fi ‘Ulum al-Quran]
Understanding the Difference in Muhkam and Mutashabih
1. Defining the intended meaning of interpretation or the extent to which it can be interpreted reveals the reasons for the differences. Interpretation can be understood in two ways:
- The true essence of a thing and what its matter is interpreted to… such as Allah’s saying, “Do they only await the fulfilment (of its warning)? The Day it will be fulfilled, those who ignored it before will say, ‘The messengers of our Lord certainly came with the truth.’” [Quran, 7:53], meaning the reality of what they were informed about regarding the Hereafter. If interpretation is meant in this sense, then the pause in recitation is at “except Allah” because only Allah knows the realities of things clearly.
- If interpretation means explanation and expression of something, like Allah‘s saying, “Inform us of its interpretation.” [Quran, 12:36], meaning its explanation, then the pause in recitation is valid at “those well-grounded in knowledge” because they understand and comprehend what they were preached with in this regard, even if they do not fully comprehend the realities of things as they are. [Ibn Kathir, Tafsir Ibn Kathir; ‘Itr, ‘Ulum al-Quran]
3. Some scholars reconciled between the opinions, stating that Allah knows the details, while the firmly grounded in knowledge know it in general. [Ibid.]
6. From this disagreement regarding the clear and ambiguous, scholars diverged in the verses of attributes and complex hadiths: Should they be interpreted based on the fact that some firmly grounded in knowledge may understand the meaning? Or not, because Allah has reserved it, and it is possible that what is intended is different from what has been interpreted, so they advocate refraining from that? These two approaches are well-known. Many scholars favored the method of interpretation and manifesting it, due to the emergence of innovations and the confusion of some innovators among those with weak intellects, leading them to believe in the apparent meanings that clear evidence has proven impossible, and consensus from both sides on not intending the apparent meaning. [Barmawi, Fawa’id al-Sanniyya fi Sharh al-Alfiyya]
Author’s Note
[Shaykh] Anas al-Musa